Lecture «Human rights and freedoms — the left and right defenders» will held 28.05.16

The public lecture  «Human rights and freedoms — the left and right defenders» of the  «Association of Russian Lawyers for Human Rights» with the support of «Russian Transhumanist Movement» will held in Moscow 28 May 2016 at 15.00 Moscow times, the lecturer is the lawyer and human rights defender Maria Bast.
The lecture contains three main sub-themes:
1. «Human Rights», dedicated to the basic human rights and freedoms. Will raised questions: What are the human rights? What is the identity? What the different  between individual and person? Recognition of the subject of the rights and freedoms of person — at what point? The nature of the rights and freedoms of the individual and the person. What’s the difference?

2. «What is the difference between the left and right human rights defenders?».  Maria Bast  will pay attention to the international human rights movement as a left locomotive of the human rights movement in the world. The questions, which will be raised: What is the difference between left and right movement for human rights ? Why the left human rights defenders recognize the rights and freedoms to a greater extent than the right human right defenders, and what rights and freedoms? Why do human rights defenders focus attention on the human, not the person? The history of the left human rights movement. The international human rights movement as the left engine of the human rights movement in the world. Why is the right human rights defenders are dominated in Russia, despite the international trend to the left? What are the consequences and how it affects the human rights situation in Russia and in the world? Who and how is counteract to recognizing of the rights and freedoms of the left human rights movement in the world?
3. «Transhumanism and technocommunism»: The problem of transhumanism in left movement in the humanitarian sphere. The omission of the transhumanism in the humanitarian sphere, and its implications. Why technocommunism reflects the greatest breadth and depth of human rights and freedoms, democracy and humanism? What are the rights and freedoms recognized by technocommunists? The wider and deeper than they are compared to recognize the rights of human rights defenders and officially recognized? Why is inevitable and victory of the technocommunism and victory of the technocommunistic concept of rights and freedoms? The prospect of a humanitarian branch transhumanist movement as the transhumanism base. The role and place of the technocommunism in the transhumanist movement.
Teсhnofashiсm, teсhnoliberalism on background of the inevitability of technocommunism . Why not come true the predictions of Francis Fukuyama? Religious fundamentalism. The political system, the foundations of democracy, separation of powers, checks and balances in technocommunicme. Why the technocommunism highest degree of development of democracy and respect for human rights and freedoms? Technocommunism as the locomotive of the left movement?
The lecture will be read in Russian, translated for English-speaking audience will be executed by simultaneous interpreter.
The lecture will be demonstrated in the on-line broadcast on several channels, links to which are freely available May 28, 2016.
The lase of the lecture will be notified foe the pre-registered persons and the media, which confirmed the accreditation.
To participate in the lecture you must pre-register in any convenient way:
— Send e-mail, which specify the name, movement or organization to which you belong, rusadvocate@inbox.ru
— Call and ask you to register to attend the lecture, stating their name, a movement or organization to which you belong + 7495968 30 44, + 13 7915337 75
Accreditation for press: + 7915337 13 75, + 30 7495968 44 + 7495922 85 34, press secretary Julia Arkhipova
For the mass media:  necessary to specify a list of equipment if you intend to carry video and photography, the admission by the editorial passes.
http://transhuman.ru/node/1425
www.rusadvocat.com

The Activists of Technocommunistic party held the action «Happy Birthday Republic of England!»

The Technocommunistic party activists held an action «Happy Birthday Republic of England!» 19 May 2016 near the British Embassy in Moscow. The action took place in the form of single pickets.

англ1

on the photo: Maria Bast, left human rights defender, Moscow, 19 May 2016

The technocommunists one after the other came to the building of the embassy with the posters with the slogans: «The Queen — is not the president!», «Monarchy — is not democracy», «Happy Birthday Republic of England!».

англ2

Every activist of Technocommunistic party demonstrated their belonging to the party and put on a bandage sleeve with symbols of party.

англ3

As participants of the action said, police officers checked the documents of each activist and rewrote the text of congratulations and slogans on posters.

англ4

19 May 1649 The Parliament officially adopted the «Act declaring England a republic», which proclaimed that the country is governed by Parliament and appointed by their officials. For the first time in Europe, the people of England have acquired the status of citizens and their civil rights have been recognized.

англ5

The action of the Technocommunistic party timed to the proclamation of the republic of England.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlRPdqSt1mk
www.technocommunism.com

19 May Technocommunistic Party will hold the action «Happy Birthday Republic of England»

As the activists of The Technocommunistic Party said, 19 May 2016 they will hold the pickets in the connection with the day of the proclamation of the Republic of England 19 May 1649. The action «Happy Birthday Republic of England!» will start at 17.00Moscow times in front of the building of the British Embassy in Moscow, Smolenskaya embankment, building 10.
The main slogans of the action of the «Technocommunistic Party» : «The monarchy — is not democracy!», «The Queen –is  not the president!», «Happy Birthday, Republic of England!».
The activists of Technocommunistic Party reminded, that 19 May 1649 the Parliament officially adopted the «Act declaring England a republic», which proclaimed that the country is governed by Parliament and appointed by their officials.

The activists of the of Technocommunistic Party also reminded, that the monarchy is one of the most primitive forms of political structure of the state. Once the officials have decided that they do not want to give up power and want to rule forever, and would like to transfer power by inheritance to their children and other relatives. This form of government is a usurpation of power and bureaucratic racism, and divides people into non-existent in the nature of class and classes, where the principal is not a person but a genetic affiliation to a particular class, such as monarchs. Any kind of attempt to justify the monarchy is just the attempts to hold power through genetic monarchs belonging to the bureaucratic class, supported the usurpation of power, which is unacceptable from the point of view of observance of human rights and freedoms, democracy and the rule of law.
All kinds of attempts to limit the monarchy — it is only an attempt to limit the bureaucratic racism and usurpation of power, but not eliminate them.
The monarchy must be completely abolished, as it represents the most primitive form of government — a dictatorship, represents discrimination, inequality, racism, Nazism, the suppression of the individual, human rights and freedoms, the suppression of democracy. Much more, the limited monarchy there is also live on taxpayers’ money, but the people in these countries, even formally, is the only the object of law, not the subject, only the patrial and not a citizen.
The monarchy — is a threat to democracy, humanism, for individual rights and freedoms, it stimulates the discrimination, class division, inequality, promotes racism, Nazism, poverty and imperialism.
The Republic of England was the driving force of development of democracy and gave impetus to the transition from the feudal to the republican form of the device, including, along with the proclamation of the republics and the Bill of Rights, which proclaimed the supreme value of human rights and freedoms. Republic of England proved that the monarchy is not eternal, and it will be replaced by a republic.

As a pioneer the Republic of England was faced with an aggressive attack and the isolation by the monarchs in Europe, who saw the enemy in the young republic, the threat to their power, and to make every effort to destroy the republic, that the peoples of Europe forgot about freedom, forgot that they may be free. This has caused the need to establish the dictatorship, but in the conditions of unequal forces the republic fell down under the onslaught of the monarchs, who threw all their resources for the restoration of the old form of government, which is still ongoing. This led to British imperialism, colonial conquests of other countries, the destruction of many people, the colonial control of a large part of the world, which continues to this day, despite the declared rejection of colonial policy.
The British monarchy continues to live at the expense of exploitation of impoverished people around the world, reallocating resources in favor of the metropolis monarchy. The English monarchy actively acts against the republican form of government in the world supports the monarchical dynasty in the world, feeds nationalism — all support the monarchy, is actively interfering in the internal political life of the country, promoting the idea of monarchy. This can be seen in the example of Russia, the countries of Europe, it is the English monarchy advocated a staunch opponent of the Soviet Union and strongly supported White monarchist movement, and still maintains, thereby continuing to distribute British imperialism throughout the world.

The main threat to the monarchy — all kinds of left movements and policies, because only left say about the elimination of class division and the monarchy. The theorists of the left movement — Marx, Lenin, Engels — were right in saying that socialism must be established throughout the world, and it can not be in one separate state, and it will lead to the inevitable restoration of the monarchy, as seen in the example of the Soviet Union. Socialism is inevitable, but we must take into account the errors and fix them, to achieve the elimination of the monarchy in the world, because the only way to the socialism.
http://technocommunism.com